|
From the Jan/Feb 2007 issue of
Wisconsin Restaurateur Magazine
by Sonya Bice
Some Wisconsin restaurants have already completed the process of getting
trans fat off their menus. Others are researching the issue, experimenting
with alternative fry oils and shortenings, and talking with their suppliers
to find workable substitutes. Meanwhile, the Wisconsin Restaurant Association
is fighting to keep government out of the restaurant kitchen and to block
trans fat bans and menu labeling proposals such as the one recently adopted
in New York City.
With an industry-wide race already on to switch to zero trans fat ingredients
and fry oil, WRA and NRA say that in this instance, government mandates
are especially unnecessary and could actually backfire if they set deadlines
without an assurance of adequate supplies of alternatives.
If there are Wisconsin restaurant operators who think concern about
trans fat is some kind of a New York fad, the rest of the industry has
a message: wake up and smell the Mazola ZT.
“We don’t foresee this issue going away,” says Susan
Quam, executive director of the WRA Education Foundation and the association’s
expert on food safety and nutrition. “The science is there.”
Sheila Cohn Weiss, director of nutrition policy for the National Restaurant
Association, explained the industry’s public stance on the question
of trans fats this way: “We’re not here to contradict the
science or to say that trans fats are healthy. Because that’s not
the case. Debating that doesn’t accomplish anything. Science shows
that trans fats contribute to heart disease and that they are not a healthy
fat, and there are substitutes available.
“It is in everyone’s best health interests to move away from
trans fats, and that is what the industry is doing.”
Everyone now concedes that the scientific evidence linking artificial
trans fats (usually just called trans fats) with heart disease is overwhelming,
and that the less trans fat a person consumes, the better. But the devil
is in the details. How can virtually an entire industry make a smooth
transition from trans fat-containing products that have been so widely
used?
NRA and WRA part ways with health advocates on outright bans or, what
some consider worse, labeling requirements aimed at restaurants—variations
of which were passed in New York City and are currently pending in 11
states— saying that they give too little consideration to the facts
on the ground, such as availability of alternatives and the time it takes
operators to find suitable substitutes for particular menu applications.
“Because there are alternatives, and because companies are moving
away from it, we support that. We just need more time though. Six months
is not enough,” Weiss said. “A lot of restaurants that have
eliminated or at least reduced trans fats have taken up to two years
to do so in order to be able to find an adequate supply and also the
appropriate type of oil that meets their needs in terms of cooking times—and
taste, most importantly.”
She also points out that some alternatives that are high in saturated
fat aren’t much of an improvement, nutritionally speaking. “Certainly,
as we move away from trans fats, we want to make sure that we avoid any
unintended consequences, and that we take into consideration both trans
fat and saturated fat.”
As it became clear that the battle against trans fats would affect virtually
all Wisconsin operators in one way or another, the staff of WRA began
working to get the facts that members would need and get response from
members on their concerns. WRA quickly conducted an informal statewide
survey asking members what they needed from WRA. The survey gave the
association a snapshot of where operators in various industry segments
are in implementing their own transitions from artificial trans fat-containing
products. (A majority of those responding—73 percent—said
their customers were concerned about trans fat; almost half were no longer
using fry oil with trans fats. And of those who still use such oil, half
are actively considering a switch to a zero trans fat version.) WRA lobbyist
Peter Hanson has begun discussing the issue with legislators to help
educate them on the difficulty of banning such a widely used ingredient.
And WRA added a free seminar on what operators need to know if they choose
to go trans fat free to its educational programming lineup on March 13
at the Wisconsin Restaurant Expo. Staff is currently developing tools
such as a list of questions to ask suppliers that will soon be available
on WRA’s web site.
WRA had an unusually high response rate to its survey, and it was clear
from responses that trans fat was on the radar of a majority of those
who responded. Operators in all segments reported having switched at
minimum their fry oils or being in the process of doing so. Others, however,
remained skeptical that their customers cared much one way or another
and were wary of increasing costs.
Trans fat transitions
Matt Moyer is executive chef of Great Dane Pub and Brewing Co., which
has three Madison locations. Moyer believes in being ahead of the curve.
“It’s an imminent change in our industry that’s going
to go this direction anyway, so we might as well be out in the forefront
of making changes,” he said. “And also, for the wellness
of our employees who dine here and the wellness of the general public
who dines here – those would be the big reasons for what we’re
doing.”
Great Dane Pub and Brewing’s staff started discussing a couple
of months ago how to put together a plan of action on making the transformation,
as well as the financial impacts on the business, and the benefits. The
management team then spent weeks identifying all the products that contain
artificial trans fat in all of the menu items.
“Fortunately for us, we make most of our food from scratch, so
it’s a little bit easier for us to make a transition. A couple
of the big things we’ve done—we’re now using a high
oleic fryer shortening, which contains no trans fats. We’re switching
our French fries to a ZTF product, we’ve eliminated the use of
any kinds of margarines, and we’re just using 100 percent butter.”
The area that’s causing the biggest difficulties, he said, is
the desserts and pastries served at Sunday brunches. “I’ve
had numerous meetings over the last couple of weeks with food brokers,
and I’ve given them lists of products that I’d like to see
alternate options for. We’ve also discussed revamping our dessert
menus and making everything in-house.”
The restaurants plan to virtually eliminate artificial trans fats by
the time they do the biannual menu update March 20. The alternatives
do come with an added cost. Moyer estimates that just the fryer shortening
change adds a cost of $5,000 to $6,000 at each restaurant per year.
So why change? “We like to be in the forefront. Our customers
are intelligent and health-conscious. As executive chef, I work at all
three restaurants, and every shift I work, there is an inquiry about
trans fat or the fryer oil. If one person is inquiring, I believe there’s
ten to fifteen that are wondering about it but not asking.”
Chris Runnalls, executive vice president of Summit Foodservice, sees
a lot of Summit’s customers moving away from trans fat ingredients
and fry oil. “Everybody’s realized,” he says, “that
this is the next big thing.”
He describes the trans fat-free oils as “premium products,” and
says they come with a premium price. His recommendation to restaurants
that do choose to switch is that they capitalize on the decision: “Some
of the zero trans fat manufacturers have marketing materials prepared
for restaurants who switch. If a restaurant is going to use this they
should definitely market it and let their customers know, hey, we are
looking out for our customers. If I, as an operator, am going to almost
double my frying oil cost, I’m going to let my customers know.
If restaurants change frying oils and don’t tell anybody, they
might as well be frying in lard.”
He likened it to a gas station putting premium gas in its regular gas
pumps without telling its customers that they were now getting premium
gas. “If they did it without telling me, even if I notice that
my car is running better, I’ll have no idea why.”
Runnalls said customers who wanted to eliminate trans fats were generally
having little difficulty switching frying oils but that they are finding
it significantly more difficult to change to trans fat-free ingredients
in baked goods without negatively affecting the taste.
Jim Womack, technical service manager for Cargill Foods, a manufacturer,
agreed that baked goods present unique challenges. “In my opinion,
baked goods represent the most difficult food category to get to zero
grams of trans per serving and maintain the same texture and flavor profile
as the current formula,” he said. “Most bakers have used
the same shortening for many years, and changing to a shortening with
no trans fat per serving can include changing mix procedures and formula
adjustments.” WR
|
Jim
Womack, technical service manager for Cargill Foods, offered the
following suggestions:
“I would recommend to first look at the labels of all the products
used in the restaurant, that is, confirm whether the term ‘partially
hydrogenated’ appears in the ingredient statement. If the food
has partially hydrogenated oil, then it may have trans fat. Many
products today are labeled with a ‘Nutritional Facts’ panel.
It is normally located to the right of the ingredient statement.
This panel should show grams of trans fat per serving. If the label
does not have information, then contact your supplier. If the product
shows to have trans fat, contact your supplier and ask if they have
a product with no trans fat per serving. Products that contain tallow
(meat fat) or butterfat will also have trans fat—however, this
is natural trans fat. The law enacted in New York and proposed in
Chicago to ban trans fat excludes natural trans fat.
“We have found that there is no single drop-in solution for trans reduction
in frying or baking. There are trade-offs with flavor, texture, and cost. Talk
to your supplier. Test the trans solution. If you have issues, try another oil
or shortening.”
Womack will present a seminar on “Going Trans Fat Free” at
the Wisconsin Restaurant Expo at 9 a.m., Tuesday, March 13. |
- When
people talk about “trans fat,” they are usually
referring to a particular kind of trans fat: artificial trans
fat, also sometimes called synthetic trans fat or trans fatty
acids (TFAs). Artificial or synthetic trans fat is created when
vegetable oil is hydrogenated to increase its shelf life, and
this is what has been tied to increases in heart disease. Artificial
trans fats are different from the trans fat that naturally occurs
in small amounts in some meat and dairy products; naturally occurring
trans fat is not affected by any of the bans.
- According to the FDA, “There is a direct,
proven relationship between diets high in trans fat content and
LDL (‘bad’)
cholesterol levels and, therefore, an increased risk of coronary
heart disease.”
- According to the FDA, food manufacturers are
allowed to list amounts of trans fat with less than 0.5 grams
as zero on the Nutrition Facts panel. As a result, some products
list 0 grams trans fat on the label, even though the ingredient
list has “shortening” or “partially
hydrogenated vegetable oil” on it. This means the food
contains less than 0.5 grams of trans fat per serving.
|
- WR -
This article is reprinted with permission
from Wisconsin Restaurateur magazine. Wisconsin Restaurateur is a bimonthly
publication of the Wisconsin Restaurant Association and is sent to all
WRA Members as a member benefit. The magazine keeps members up to date
on the latest industry trends.
For information on becoming a WRA member,
call 800.589.3211
|